Yeah, Nat got it right, it was all about being fun and entertaining, not mainkg a documentary and not mainkg people go, "Wow! How did they do that?"The lightning bolt turning into a palooka who gives the captain a hook to the jaw is fantastic, it even has a smile when it does that! Smiling lightning, you can't get more cartoony than that - or can ya'? http://qbxxhrjwu.com [url=http://nwyganeglfh.com]nwyganeglfh[/url] [link=http://vlbipg.com]vlbipg[/link]

I do have the tapes, so I just watched the crtaoon on volume 1. I think the lightning is actually less striking (honestly, that wasn't an intentional pun) on the tape than in the clip (altho it's possible that's due to me watching the entire crtaoon, and thus becoming more acclimated to crtaoon visuals before the lightning shows up), but it does look much better on the tape. My relative aesthetic opinion within the segment at issue remains unchanged tho; the lightning is one of the weakest visuals for me in that segment. And the lightning still doesn't look very appealing to me (too hosey, I think; the things I dislike are much more evident in the clip than on tape, tho, except in the static bolt used as stairs where it's actually not hosey but still aesthetically displeasing to me in both versions in more or less equal measures).

The creativity in this clip is quite cliidlhke in its in-its-own-world ness, but obviously with a kind of adult wit/ self-awareness that allows it to enjoy itself even more intensely. On the idea of creativity of this purity being a thing of the distant past People are so uptight now! Maybe this isn't relevant to cartoons, I don't know, but I notice in a lot of fields, say in pop music that there's an insane tendency to work backwards starting with the production values, where the details' and the painfully deliberate pop culture references are perceived as the most important decision and the first priority, whereas pure vital creativity (and manual skill, which to my mind sort of goes hand in hand with it) are secondary concerns at best. Usually neglected altogether in the quest for the optimum sample or the optimum type of gloss. That kind of approach is also fuelled by the tendency of uncreative ego-fuelled posers to work in creative fields instead of actual artists. The simplest thing that's missing is the idea that music starts with musicians, who have a love of music and take joy in the form-specific abstract sensual aspects of it, or that cartoons start with cartoonists who have a love of cartoons and the form-specific abstract sensual aspects of them. Instead everything seems to start with a self-conscious, stifling idea about marketing, and not just one that's imposed by executives; it's an idea that creative' people seem to impose on themselves.It's not so much post-modernism itself that's the problem, but people's perverse interpretations of it. There's a perception of the weight of the canon' of pop culture bearing down on us and preventing us from being creative. Then there's another idea that nothing now can be original or pure, the best we can hope to be is clever' in kind of a deadpan post-everything kind of way, which of course is wrong, and logically extremely flimsy if poked. So going back to the Natwick clip I realise that the reason you post these things is not just to lament the loss of this type of creativity, or to be nostalgic, it's to question why it needs to be lost and the answer is that it doesn't, and we're all kind of responsible for taking on board what that means.The way I see it there are just things obscuring that pure natural state of creativity, it's still potentially there underneath if we can devise ways to dispense with all the crap that makes people uptight.It's a shame in a way that something so simple and silly and fun should cause me to write so many analytical words, it should primarily be enjoyed, of course. But I guess there's a need for the undoing of the bad ideas that have largely stopped people making cartoons that are fundamentally about generating joy for both the audience and the creator.

it would hit. i read your SL theory and i also read many other frmous writing about watching the charts and not putting Stop Losses in place as many brokers are manipulating the charts. one forex forum was stating one of the best traders was making GBPUSD trades only putting TP and watching them freeflow for a few hours but eventually where all hitting previous Demand /Supply levels. Genius'.Overall i must say i am learning from your signals that come in Group 2. I also agree with the following comment the member wrote last month quoted below:- A MEMBER SENT THIS AND ALL SHOULD READ AND THINK LIKE THIS BELOW :- READ CAREFULLYHi,I like your website and I like the way you call your signals Hypothetical FX Signals. I believe every trader should be responsible for his own trades.I also like the incentive of prospective trader to open a brokerage account with TadawulFX in order to get your Hypothetical FX Signals for free.I checked their website and also like their options.I want to open a mini account with them to get your Hypothetical FX Signals. (Is there a minimum balance I should deposit? I noticed that they don’t have $100 minimum, their minimum was $500-which is OK).What is the next step? Do I notify you with my account numbers?Thanks in advance for your reply.I’m looking forward to enjoying your service.Thanks again guys!Tom P

Breathtakingly Beautiful

Taylor with daughter Liza and husband Mike Todd, 1957

photo by alan light